Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05642
Original file (BC 2012 05642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05642

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to:

	1.  Include receipt of the Elementary Excellence in 
Competition Rifleman Badge.

	2.  His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty, be amended to include the Elementary Excellence in 
Competition Rifleman Badge.

	3.  He receive a replacement badge with his name and date 
engraved on the badge.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was awarded the Elementary Excellence in Competition Rifleman 
Badge while he was stationed in Panama, but the badge is not 
reflected in his records.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 8 Jul 75, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force (RegAF).  He retired on 1 Oct 98 and was 
credited with 23 years, 2 months, and 23 days of active service.

Per the news article provided by the applicant he was awarded 
the Elementary Level Excellence in Competition Bronze Rifle Shot 
Badge.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to add 
the Elementary Excellence in Competition Rifleman Badge to his 
military records.  AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of 
Air Force Personnel, directs the wear of uniforms, insignias, 
awards, and decorations; however, the Elementary Excellence in 
Competition Rifleman Badge is not listed as an authorized item 
to be worn on the Air Force uniform.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial to list the Elementary Excellence 
in Competition Rifleman Badge on the applicant’s DD Form 214.  
Per the DPSIM advisory, the badge is not authorized for wear on 
the Air Force uniform and is therefore not authorized to be 
listed on the DD Form 214.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 14 Aug 13, for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

?
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05642 in Executive Session on 7 Oct 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Dec 12, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 22 May 13.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 13 Jun 13.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Aug 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05642

    Original file (BC 2012 05642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Elementary Excellence in Competition Rifleman Badge while he was stationed in Panama, but the badge is not reflected in his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01547

    Original file (BC 2014 01547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01547 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following Air Force Occupational Badge, Qualification Badge, and Medals: a. Combat Crewmember Qualification Badge c. Bosnia Combat Medal d. Croatia Combat Medal e. Serbia Combat Medal f. North Atlantic Treaty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00919

    Original file (BC 2014 00919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00919 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty be updated to reflect “Operation DESERT STORM/SHIELD campaign badge Was Authorized” and he receive an updated DD Form 214. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to have an Operation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893

    Original file (BC 2013 05893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02729

    Original file (BC 2013 02729 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02729 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Master Force Protection badge with the star and wreath. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He recently learned that one month after his retirement, the Air Force Uniform Board approved special agents with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI) to wear the Force Protection badge. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02666

    Original file (BC-2012-02666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02666 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: 1. Per applicable Department of Defense and Air Force Instructions, participation in contingency operations, but not geographic locations, are allowed to be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04283

    Original file (BC-2012-04283.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Report of Individual Counseling (RIC), dated 3 Aug 06, be removed from his records. The complete SGH evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIM recommends denying the applicant’s request to remove the RIC from his Personnel Information File (PIF) since the PIF became obsolete when the applicant separated from the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05327

    Original file (BC 2012 05327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Unable to complete electronic profile at this time but currently in process.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While we note the comments from AFPC/DPSIM indicating the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988

    Original file (BC 2014 01988.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicant’s commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall “3” based upon the applicant’s failure to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03437

    Original file (BC 2014 03437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force District of Washington (AFDW) Qualifying Positions for Wear of the HAF Badge policy, dated 1 May 13, and the AFDW Guidance Memorandum to AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel, state “This authorization applies retroactively to Ceremonial Guardsman still actively serving in the Total Force.” A copy of the complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. ? APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...